The case, explained

Omnibus Decree: The New 2018-2022 Tax Amnesty

7 min read · Updated September 2026 · Editorial oversight: Avv. Federico Papa

According to national press reports, with the recent updates of September 2026, the regulatory framework regarding the so-called special voluntary disclosure has undergone a significant evolution. The new discipline, originating from the 2024 Omnibus Decree, has been consolidated through Legislative Decree 148/2026, which extended tax amnesty benefits for the 2020-2023 period to those renewing their adherence to the two-year preventive agreement. This measure represents a fundamental step for regularizing past tax liabilities, offering an advantageous way out for a wide range of taxpayers. In this article, we will analyze the technical aspects of the measure, distinguishing it from the structural reforms of sanctions discussed in dedicated articles in this column. Through the twin case of Gaio Sventura, we will explore the methods for calculating the substitute tax and the strict procedural bars provided for those intending to access this tax shield.

Omnibus Decree: The New 2018-2022 Tax Amnesty

In brief

The article analyzes the tax amnesty introduced by the Omnibus Decree (D.L. 113/2024), focusing on the special voluntary disclosure for the 2018-2022 fiscal years reserved for ISA entities adhering to the Two-year Preventive Agreement. It examines the calculation criteria for the substitute tax, based on tax reliability scores, and the preclusive effects on audits. The study delves into the 2026 updates, constitutional issues related to the extension of expiration terms, and operational lessons for managing tax litigation.

  1. The fact

    The case originates from the approval of Decree-Law 113/2024, known as the Omnibus Decree, and its subsequent conversion into Law 143/2024. According to «Il Sole 24 Ore», the legislator intended to create a strong incentive for joining the two-year preventive agreement by offering the possibility to settle the fiscal years between 2018 and 2022. Economic news highlighted how this measure was received with great interest but also caution by professionals, due to the complex mechanisms for calculating the substitute tax. The most recent development, reported by the specialized press in September 2026, concerns the entry into force of Legislative Decree 148/2026, which reopened the terms for subsequent years. Currently, the matter is in a phase of full administrative implementation, with the Revenue Agency engaged in the first checks on the regularity of installment payments. No criminal proceedings of national significance have been recorded at the moment, as it is a purely tax-related procedure aimed at preventing litigation through the payment of amounts calculated on a statistical basis.

  2. The rules at play

    The cornerstone of the measure is Art. 2-quater of D.L. 113/2024, which governs the special voluntary disclosure. This rule establishes that entities that have applied ISA and join the agreement can regularize the past by paying a substitute tax. The function of the rule is twofold: to guarantee certain revenues to the State and to offer the taxpayer a tax shield against future audits. The predicted consequences vary based on the taxpayer's fiscal report card: the increase in the tax base ranges from 5% for those with high ISA scores up to 50% for those with minimum scores. Another essential regulatory reference is Art. 39 of Presidential Decree 600/1973, whose corrections are expressly prohibited by the completion of the amnesty. Finally, the law provides for an extension of the assessment terms until December 31, 2027, for those who join, to allow the financial administration the necessary time to check the correctness of the amnesty itself.

  3. What the jurisprudence says

    According to analysis by jurist Benedetto Santacroce in «NT+ Fisco», jurisprudence has begun to outline the first application boundaries. The Court of Tax Justice of Verona clarified that the completion of the amnesty, which occurs with the payment of the first installment, constitutes an insurmountable preclusion for the start of new audits, unless investigative acts were notified before the payment. Consistent with the principles of the Cassation, it was also reaffirmed that the failure to file the original ISA declaration radically prevents access to the benefit. The orientations of the judges emphasize that the nature of the special voluntary disclosure is reward-based and requires strict adherence to formal requirements, as late regularization beyond the deadlines set for the initial payment is not allowed.

  4. Analysis drafted and verified with edit.legal

    To verify the provisions cited in this article, we used edit.legal. Test our legal AI on official sources and apply it to your own matters.

    Try edit.legal AI
  5. What it teaches professionals

    1. Monitoring of preclusions: carefully check for any PVCs or draft acts notified before joining, as they render the amnesty null.
    2. Rigor in ISA calculation: accurately reconstruct historical ISA scores, as an error in calculating the increase in the tax base can invalidate the entire disclosure.
    3. Installment management: set up strict payment schedules for clients, given that forfeiture of the benefit is automatic and not rectifiable in case of failure to make subsequent payments.
    4. Cost-benefit assessment: analyze whether the extension of assessment terms to 2027 is an acceptable price compared to the risk of an ordinary assessment based on financial investigations.

References: D.L. 113/2024L. 143/2024D.Lgs. 148/2026DPR 600/1973

Avv. Federico Papa
Editorial oversight: Avv. Federico Papa·ICAMContent drafted with AI support and subject to editorial source checks. Despite these controls, inaccuracies may remain: reports and rectification requests are welcome. Report a correction

Frequently asked questions

Is access to the amnesty allowed if an audit has already been received?

No, if a tax audit report or a draft assessment act relating to the relevant years has already been notified, access to the amnesty is barred.

What are the consequences of failing to pay an amnesty installment?

Failure to pay one of the installments by the deadline for the next one results in forfeiture of the benefit, with the loss of the tax shield and the reopening of terms for ordinary audits.

Does the amnesty also cover VAT?

Yes, completion of the amnesty prohibits VAT adjustments pursuant to Art. 54 of Presidential Decree 633/1972, limited to the regularized years.

Verified legal research and drafting with edit.legal

Legal research and drafting with citations checked against official databases. edit.legal is free to try, no credit card.

Try edit.legal for free