Practical guide
How to draft the withdrawal from judicial proceedings with AI
4 min read · Updated September 2026 · Editorial oversight: Avv. Federico Papa
The withdrawal from judicial proceedings (rinuncia agli atti del giudizio) is a key mechanism for terminating a civil trial before a judgment on the merits. Governed by Art. 306 c.p.c., it demands formal precision and adherence to strict subjective requirements.
In brief
The withdrawal from judicial proceedings (rinuncia agli atti del giudizio) extinguishes the lawsuit without preventing the re-filing of the claim. To be effective, it must be signed by the party or a proxy with special power of attorney (mandato speciale) and accepted by any appearing parties who might have an interest in continuing the trial. Unless otherwise agreed, the withdrawing party must reimburse the legal costs of the other parties. Using edit.legal helps in verifying the mandate requirements and managing bilingual templates for cross-border disputes.
The steps
- 1.
Verification of subjective requirements and special mandate
The first step is verifying that the person performing the withdrawal (rinuncia) has the power to do so. Under Art. 306 c.p.c., the withdrawal must be made by the party personally or by a special proxy (procuratore speciale). It is important to note that a standard power of attorney (procura alle liti) does not usually grant the power to withdraw from the acts of the case unless specifically stated. Without a specific special mandate for the withdrawal, the act is void and will not lead to the extinction of the proceedings. edit.legal can assist in checking the mandate clause to ensure powers were correctly granted.
- 2.
Identification of the parties required to accept
Withdrawal is not a strictly unilateral act if other parties have appeared in court. For the withdrawal to be effective, it must be accepted by those parties who might have an interest in continuing the proceedings. For instance, if the defendant has filed a counterclaim (domanda riconvenzionale) or if the case has reached a stage where a judgment on the merits could be favorable to them, acceptance is mandatory. If the counterparts have not appeared (contumaci), acceptance is not required. Therefore, one must map the status of the parties' appearances before proceeding with the filing of the notice of withdrawal.
- 3.
Drafting the content and the costs clause
The document must be clear and unconditional. It must contain an express declaration of withdrawal from the proceedings and, if possible, the simultaneous acceptance of the counterpart to speed up the extinction. A critical element is the regulation of legal costs. Art. 306 c.p.c. states that the withdrawing party must reimburse the costs to the other parties unless there is a different agreement. It is common practice to include a cost-sharing or offset clause (compensazione delle spese) signed by both lawyers if an out-of-court settlement has been reached. Drafting the minutes or the notice via edit.legal ensures these clauses comply with current forensic practices.
- 4.
Methods of declaration: in court or via served notice
Withdrawal and acceptance can occur in two ways: through a statement recorded in the court minutes during a hearing, or via a notice served on the other parties. If opting for a written notice outside of court, it must be signed by the withdrawing party (or special proxy) and served via PEC (certified email) or court bailiffs to the appearing counterparts only. Service upon non-appearing parties (contumaci) is not required, as withdrawal is not included in the mandatory list of acts to be served under Art. 292 c.p.c. (cf. Cass. n. 26330/2020). Subsequently, the notice and proof of service must be filed in the electronic case file (fascicolo telematico). Timeliness is essential, as withdrawal can occur at any stage and level of the proceedings, provided it is before the case is taken under deliberation by the judge or the panel.
- 5.
The judge's order of extinction
Once the regularity of the withdrawal and acceptance is verified, the judge (or the president of the panel) declares the extinction of the process via an order (ordinanza). If there is an agreement on costs, the judge takes note of it; otherwise, the judge proceed with the liquidation of costs against the withdrawing party within the same order. It is crucial to note that the order of extinction following a withdrawal cannot be challenged through ordinary appeals but is subject to a complaint (reclamo) to the panel under Art. 308 c.p.c. if issued by the examining judge. edit.legal helps monitor the deadlines for a potential complaint in case of errors in cost liquidation.
Legal basis: Art. 306 c.p.c.Art. 307 c.p.c.Art. 308 c.p.c.Art. 310 c.p.c.Art. 83 c.p.c.Art. 292 c.p.c.
Mistakes to avoid
- Execution of the notice by a lawyer lacking a specific special power of attorney.
- Forgetting to include a clause regarding the cost agreement, leading the judge to automatically liquidate costs against the withdrawing party.
- Confusing the withdrawal from proceedings (306 c.p.c.) with the waiver of the right (which requires no acceptance but prevents future lawsuits).
Frequently asked questions
What happens if the counterpart does not accept the withdrawal?
If the counterpart has a qualified interest in continuing (e.g., a counterclaim or negative declaration), the trial proceeds. If they have no interest, silence or lack of acceptance might be evaluated by the judge, but technically acceptance is a requirement for efficacy.
Does the withdrawal from the proceedings extinguish the substantive right?
No. The withdrawal under Art. 306 c.p.c. only concerns the procedure (withdrawal from the acts). The right to re-file the claim in a new lawsuit remains unaffected, provided the statute of limitations has not expired.
Is it possible to partially withdraw from the proceedings?
Partial withdrawal (e.g., against only one defendant in a case of permissive joinder) is allowed, but it must be handled carefully to prevent the subjective extinction from impacting the entire trial.

What edit.legal automates
- —Instant verification of the validity of the special power of attorney for withdrawal within the digital file.
- —Automated generation of the withdrawal notice and acceptance with standardized cost-offsetting clauses.
- —Deadline tracking for filing a complaint against the extinction order under Art. 308 c.p.c.
- —Bilingual drafting support for proceedings involving foreign entities or international jurisdiction.
Put edit.legal to the test on actual cases
Try edit.legal for free on an active case. No credit card required.
Try edit.legal for freeThis guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice for your specific case.